UPCOMING: Events

View Poll Results: what would you rather be driving?

Voters
37. You may not vote on this poll
  • 1959 Bel Air

    23 62.16%
  • 2009 Malibu

    14 37.84%
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: if you were in a head on crash?

  1. #21

    Default Car

    Not only that, they like to fold in half.


    Quote Originally Posted by Justahobby View Post
    It's not just the exterior damage but the lack of padded steering wheels, dash, plate glass, and no air bags that make old cars a death trap.
    Last edited by sampsonndelila; Thu, 10th Dec 2009 at 08:28 PM. Reason: spelling
    275 gal, loving my new stand.
    Always looking for big fish.
    CARTER

  2. #22

    Default

    Uh, did the 59 Bel Air even have seat belts? As a auto claims guy, I bet the safety rating of the Malibu is a little better.
    http://www.millan.net/minimations/sm...riumsmile1.gif - Mike and Kristy -


    "You're gonna need a bigger boat." Brody (Jaws)



  3. #23
    Join Date
    12-09-2006
    Location
    Fair Oaks Ranch, TX
    Posts
    443

    Default

    The old car will increase your injury claim over the new car. Personally I would rather be uninjured then have a big pile on money, a small pile is just fine.

    As to the MB being the better then others. There is some truth to that, MB and Volvo both make their uni-bodies different then everyone else, which is why they are the safest cars on the road.
    wesheltonj

    90g Oceanic Reef-Ready Bowfront w/ AquaIllumination LED & GHL Profilux 3eX

  4. #24
    Join Date
    02-25-2008
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    3,145

    Default

    Eh, I'll stick with my stretch limo.
    I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.
    Groucho Marx

  5. #25

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bstreep View Post
    Yeah, I can picture this:

    You get to choose which car to ride into that scenario. You telling me that 98 out of 100 don't take the MB keys? Right. .
    im not telling you anything.... IIHS is. just thought it was close


    Quote Originally Posted by bstreep View Post
    MB has a history of not relying on those crash tests, but instead, their own of many thousands of vehicles. Unlike BMW -where performance is #1 - safety has always been the highest priority for MB. They will continue to be in our stable. .
    not discounting MB in any way. this post didnt start out with anything MB. my point was mainly that engineering in modern vehicles will blow your mind. it blew mine!!

    Quote Originally Posted by bstreep View Post
    Go over to European Car Parts on Eckert @ Bandera. Go look at the wrecked cars there. Then tell me you would rather ride a Malibu into that scenario over a MB. Or the Malibu over a Saab, BTW.
    uh.... i see all kinds of wrecked cars every day. thousands and thousands in the last 6 yrs at KB cad hummer saab. everything from kia to maybach and mini to H1 alpha. the malibu is a great car as well as anything else that gets me from a to b safely. by the way what did you vote for before seeing the data? i chose the 1959 Bel Air honestly.
    Last edited by saabtech; Fri, 11th Dec 2009 at 12:39 AM.

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    Uh, did the 59 Bel Air even have seat belts? As a auto claims guy, I bet the safety rating of the Malibu is a little better.
    all it had was a lap belt.
    and a steering column in your eye!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •