UPCOMING: Events

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Biology vs. Technology....

  1. #11
    Join Date
    07-06-2012
    Location
    San Anotnio
    Posts
    136

    Default

    I can see what you're saying. If laziness was growing by X it is probably growing by X^10 as technology gets cheaper and more readibily available.

  2. #12

    Default

    Something like that. Lol
    i think whatever route a person decides to follow there has to be some form of active interaction with their tank.
    John

    "Critics are men who watch a battle from a high place and then come down and shoot the survivors." Ernest Hemingway

  3. #13
    Join Date
    06-29-2011
    Location
    NW San Antonio
    Posts
    3,597

    Default

    I think finding a balance between both is the best. As stated, it all really depends on the system and the keeper. I love automation, but I also love doing *something* with the tank. Then again, I try not to do too much.

    For example, an ATO is definitely technology, but a great one to have. It's not that I'm too lazy to top off with RO, it's that the system is more stable with an ATO. If I have to do it manually, my SG is going to swing when I top off nightly, or the next day, or whenever I remember/get to it. Especially with my rimless, there is about 2 gallons of evap per day. I love being able to watch my tank, hear a click, a little water and I'm like, "Hey, my tank just topped itself off."
    -You had me at PWM

  4. #14
    Join Date
    08-28-2007
    Location
    Stone Oak PKWY, SA/TX
    Posts
    13,593

    Default

    I'm all for biology first...then technology. The basics for all of my reef aquariums have consisted of powerheads, sump, refugium, heater, fans, lights, return pump and skimmer along with the largest fuge possible, lots of live rock and a DSB that is regularly turned in small sections by natural reef inhabitants either in the sump or display. An ATO is also a must in my opinion.

    As problems arise I always try to address them naturally first, I almost always stay clear of treatments unless all other natural resources have been exhausted. When things get out of control, only then will I consider adding technology such as a reactor etc.

    Frequent small water changes seem to be the cure for many issues.
    Last edited by Mr Cob; Tue, 4th Sep 2012 at 06:46 AM.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    06-29-2011
    Location
    NW San Antonio
    Posts
    3,597

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Cob View Post
    Frequent small water changes seem to be the cure for many issues.
    I'm actually trying to get onto 5g twice a week to see what it does for my system. I was performing 10g 1x weekly but figured it's easier to do 5g since I don't have to stop my system while doing it. I've also read time and time again that smaller more frequent WCs are better.
    -You had me at PWM

  6. #16
    Join Date
    03-04-2005
    Location
    NE San Antonio
    Posts
    11,696

    Default

    that is what i do on the 250 - 5 gallons twice a week.
    Ace
    The Shade Tree Craftsman



  7. #17
    Join Date
    08-28-2007
    Location
    Stone Oak PKWY, SA/TX
    Posts
    13,593

    Default

    I know Ace does twice a week small water changes. I have never been able to do more than once a week.

    Though...when we had the MCC tanks up I did small water changes every Monday when we would ship coral, every Wednesday when we would do local pickups. Plus every third Sunday when we had Austin deliveries. I noticed a huge decline in water quality when I stopped this routine.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    08-28-2007
    Location
    Stone Oak PKWY, SA/TX
    Posts
    13,593

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •