It uses half of the gas that a power plant currently uses, so that's 50% in savings to the consumer, less the cost of the box at 3 grand. The major companies are not using them 100%, so their ROI is less on the frontside. Also, in CA they get all the Green Energy tax breaks and subsidizing, further driving down the overall cost of the product.

I think if it uses 50% less of the gas with no combustion, it's worthwhile to check out. What I want to know is the byproduct of the reaction that is caused to generate the energy. It has to create some type of waste?

My other concern is how much oxygen it uses.

I still say the best most natural way to get the carbon out of our air is through planktonic blooms. Stir up some detritus, make some planktonic life, absorb some Co2. Currently the oceans are what really have an affect on Co2 absorbtion, not trees.

Either way, the internets have brought us to a pinnacle in our society. So much is being REdiscovered these days, and that is phenomenal.

Have y'all seen the air car? The motor in that baby is a phenom too! It's an air powered piston that drives it. Well, they can use the compressed air, to run a generator. That generator compresses air, thus refilling itself. Perpetual Motion is within our grasp. That's probably what they will figure out on 12-21-2012!