UPCOMING: Events

View Poll Results: CALCIUM REACTOR OR CONTINUE B-IONIC

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • GO WITH THE REACTOR

    6 30.00%
  • JUST STAY WITH B-IONIC

    9 45.00%
  • I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU DO

    5 25.00%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: CALCIUM REACTOR -VS- TWO PART DOSING

  1. #11
    Join Date
    07-21-2005
    Location
    281N of 1604, San Antonio, TX
    Posts
    5,844

    Default

    Unless you have a tankful of SPS, I'm not a fan of Ca reactors. When my tank was full of SPS, I was! It's complex, tricky, and easy to nuke a tank.
    Bill

    215g FOWLR... and anemones, GSP, gorgonians... carp, that isn't FO!

    "I killed my first SW Fish in 1971..."

  2. #12
    Join Date
    03-28-2008
    Location
    Kerrville
    Posts
    531

    Default

    Thanks bstreep. not sure if I'm going to do the reactor at this point. I need to research some more. I'm looking for less maintenance type items like manual dosing because kids are getting older and doing sports, etc. So, not sure which option to choose yet but I have appreciated all of the advice!

    -Mike

  3. #13

    Default

    I run a cal reactor and also a kalk reactor on my 180. I was using two part with good results, but prior to my deployment I got the reactors to make it simple for the wife. The only problem that I have had with my setup is that sometimes the AC III does not turn on the CO2, but that is not a big deal as the PH in the reactor just goes up. I get an email and call the wife and she fixes it (unplug and replug). This is a problem with the AC III though, it must be pluged into either port 4 or 8 on the DC8. Well to sum it all up I would not switch back as this is one less thing that I have to remember to do to this tank.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •