UPCOMING: Events

Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: MH vs T5s?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    06-19-2008
    Location
    Round Rock, TX
    Posts
    76

    Default MH vs T5s?

    Which one is better in a smaller tank. I want to be able to keep sps and clams and stuff, but don't want an overwhelming electricity bill at the same time!!!

    I was thinking of 1 250W HQI MH with a 10,000k XM and 2 39W T5 actinics on a 40 breeder.

    Any thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    06-19-2008
    Location
    Round Rock, TX
    Posts
    76

    Default

    I just noticed RayAllen's post on the 14,000k MH bulb which sounds like a possibility. I just want the best for my tank and not have to worry about it later.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    02-07-2003
    Location
    1604 and Bandera
    Posts
    361

    Default

    I have a 400 watt single end 14k hamilton MH bulb+ actinics, and I LOVE it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    02-07-2007
    Location
    NW San Antonio
    Posts
    984

    Default

    MH=Heat
    T-5=Little or no heat

    less water means your tank will heat up faster unless you dont mind spending more money on a chiller
    Going to change my screenname to ReefCube soon!

  5. #5

    Default

    classic t5 vs mh debate. t5s= ability to maintain sps,clams,etc at all levels in tank (provided you get the correct reflectors and bulbs), cheaper to buy and run, cooler (as long as you run fans on the ends of the bulbs). IMO both will work.

    cheers,

    kurt
    75gal 6x54w t5's on icecap slr's 3 blue +, 1 pro color, 1 ge 65k, 1 uvl spuer atintic, iwaki 40rlt return, mak 4 on closed loop to om super squirt, mak 3 on etss reef devil, jbj artica chiller, aquamedic calcium reactor, DIY Kalk reactor, DIY media reactor, currently running half phospahte/half carbon.

    Live in Uvalde, Texas. On the fish hatchery!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    11-21-2007
    Location
    Corpus Christi
    Posts
    283

    Default

    I have about 500 watts of T5 over my 150 and have been very happy. I have had great growth on softies, LPS, and SPS. I recently added a bunch more SPS this past weekend...so we'll see how those do.

    I think the big difference...and what made me go with the T5's was heat. I didn't want to have to buy a chiller...right now with a couple of quiet fans, my temp maintains 77-79 degrees F with no problems.

    MH's do have a much more concentrated beam allowing them to penetrate further...so for most people with tanks deeper than 24"...they have to go with MH. As far as PAR goes, I have read that though the PAR for T5's is not as high as MH...it is pretty darn close...and for me the benefits to having the low heat/more efficient T5's outweighed what it lacked in comparison to the MH. Additionally, having multiple T5 bulbs allows a good amount of freedom regarding the color of light you want to display in your tank. With a MH, you're going to have to make a big decision on which 1 MH bulb you want to put in there.

    I don't know if it was mentioned before...but in order for T5's to hold their own, each bulb has its own reflector...like a TEK or an IceCap.

    HTH,
    Jamie
    ><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸.·´¯`·...¸><((((º>
    ·´¯`·.¸. , . .·´¯`·.. >((((º>

  7. #7
    Join Date
    06-19-2008
    Location
    Round Rock, TX
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Thanks for the replies. I'm definitely leaning more towards T5s instead. I am probably going to get 2 of the T5s retrofit kit.

    http://www.hellolights.com/index.asp...OD&ProdID=1350

  8. #8
    Join Date
    02-25-2008
    Location
    Way out West. Culebra and 1560
    Posts
    5,347

    Default

    You want to fit as many bulbs as possible across for best coverage and growth especially with hard corals.
    200g-No Corals Yet!



Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •