UPCOMING: Events

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Opinions on Lighting for a 90 Gallon

  1. #1

    Default Opinions on Lighting for a 90 Gallon

    I need a retrofit kit for canopy on a 90 gallon (48 inches long / tank is 25 inches deep). I'm mostly a softy and LPS guy but I might want to try my hand at SPS at some point. I've spent a lot of time reading forums, books, etc. Just curious if you were in my shoes what would you recommend for lighting? Thanks!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    03-28-2006
    Location
    S.A. 1560 & 471
    Posts
    71

    Default

    2x250w SE MH coral-vue reeflux lamps and a 2 t5 actinic would be the way that i would go.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    02-12-2004
    Location
    Far West SA 1604 and Culebra
    Posts
    4,157

    Default

    I agree 2x250w but from what ive seen I prefer DE bulbs over SE. DE bulbs are said to give you a higher PAR. Go 14-20k and you will not need Actinic supplementation unless wanted. Heres a good read

    http://www.marinedepot.com/ps_Aquari...bs_information
    Last edited by RayAllen; Thu, 17th Apr 2008 at 11:19 PM.
    Ray Allen
    San Antonio, TX
    1604 Culebra/Shanefield
    rba0284@gmail.com
    40g Breeder Reef Aquarium

  4. #4

    Default

    2x250 all the way, your softies will love it in the middle and toward the bottom and your SPS will love it up a little higher on the rocks. I'd go with a 14kk Phoenix lamp and I still prefer VHO over T5 for actinic supplementation.

  5. #5

    Default

    And the arguement continues: 2 x 250w Reeflux 12K SE and that's all.

  6. #6

    Default

    I would consider 6x54w t5 retro with icecap reflectors and icecap ballasts. I would use ati bulbs with maybe a ge 65k bulb. I went from a 400w reeflux to this set-up and love it. I love the fact that you can play with the spectrum (target certain bulbs over certain corals). For example, I got my A. lovelli to change color from sky blue throughout, to sky blue tips and a red base (using an ati procolor bulb). Bulbs are cheaper. Bulbs are way more efficent, i save about 30 bucks a month on power. Plus the bulbs will not heat the room up as bad a MH, which would make the chiller work harder. The only major complaint about t5's is that they do not produce the shimmer that MH do. Not that I'm a hardcore t5 guy but i think its an option that you must consider. FYI, I have a stone garden taking up all 18 inches of depth in the 75g.
    Last edited by Fish4life; Fri, 18th Apr 2008 at 07:01 AM.
    75gal 6x54w t5's on icecap slr's 3 blue +, 1 pro color, 1 ge 65k, 1 uvl spuer atintic, iwaki 40rlt return, mak 4 on closed loop to om super squirt, mak 3 on etss reef devil, jbj artica chiller, aquamedic calcium reactor, DIY Kalk reactor, DIY media reactor, currently running half phospahte/half carbon.

    Live in Uvalde, Texas. On the fish hatchery!

  7. #7

    Default

    I totally agree with fish4life. My current tank is too deep (36") to run anything less than MH, but when I had my 90gal I packed it w/ 8 icecap VHOs and it rocked. I kept clams and montiporas, birdsnest, etc but mostly had lps and softies. My friend had an 8 t5 setup over his 150 and kept pretty much everything - it was amazing!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •