RE: Gary, or someone; Can you check in to this chemical issu
The question was whether there was a problem with high sulfates resulting from using Magnesium supplements which are mainly Magnesium Sulfate.
My reply was really a question. What data is there to support the claim that sulfates accumulate. Who has tested for it and if there is a problem, can anyone show me where high sulfates result in a negative impact.
Sulfates are exported by a couple of mechanisms.
1. Water changes
2. Conversion by bacteria to hydrogen sulfide that is a gas and off-gases like CO2 does through the skimmer and surface water gas exchange processes.
3. Deposition as Iron Sulfide, which is inert, in the DSB. This is the black stuff that you see in a DSB when you move a tank.
4. Sulfate is utilized by plants and bacteria for growth in much the same way that phosphates are. Since sulfate is rarely in short supply in water as is phosphate, it does not cause a bloom.
Processes 2 & 3 primarily occur in DSB the same way that denitrification does. This may be more of an issue for folks that are running BB tanks. The bacteria that do this are similar to those that process nitrate to nitrogen. They are called sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) and are anaerobes or facultatives. They were first discovered in ocean sediments. Desulfovibrio is the most common of these bacteria.
This discussion is similar to the arguments that went on a few years ago about the negative impact of chloride buildup from the use of two part additives such as ESV. The difference is that sulfates aren't inert like chlorides are. They are used by plants and bacteria and cycled. Just as we talk about nitrogen and phosphate cycles, there is such a thing as a sufur cycle too.
OK, is that Spam or just TMI?
Gary
125 SPS, 75 gal. LPS/softie reef, 9 gal. Nano