UPCOMING: Events

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: MH vs. T5... Why so much push for MH...

  1. #21
    Join Date
    02-25-2008
    Location
    Way out West. Culebra and 1560
    Posts
    5,347

    Default

    Here's my video that I made awhile back...

    200g-No Corals Yet!



  2. #22
    Join Date
    02-12-2004
    Location
    Far West SA 1604 and Culebra
    Posts
    4,157

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alton View Post
    http://www.reefgeek.com/lighting/T5_...!_Bulbs_by_ATI

    I would love to try this fixture on my 300, any one want to float me a long term loan? And I am still looking at 808 watts, but it would be nice!
    Wow, thats one sweet light!

    I can not ever see paying more than my monthly mortgage on any one peice of equipment. I just cant justify doing it. Definately could not explain that one to my wife either, lol.
    Ray Allen
    San Antonio, TX
    1604 Culebra/Shanefield
    rba0284@gmail.com
    40g Breeder Reef Aquarium

  3. #23
    Join Date
    08-28-2007
    Location
    Stone Oak PKWY, SA/TX
    Posts
    13,593

    Default

    Hey that's under my payment....lol, does that mean I can justify it? My justification is...I can't spend more $ than my car payment on any equipment. lol (my payment is low too....that's why I have to trade for everything...haha)

  4. #24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rockmp View Post
    Has anyone ever done the math for power consumption on MH? I wonder in the long run if it would be cheaper for T5's?
    Just doing some basic maths, 2x 250w would use 500W, and then add 2x 54W, or 4x54W to add the blues, etc... (if you were going to run a hybrid fixture) it would give you around 716W. Compared to an 8 bulb 54W fixture, you'd look at around 432W.

    Quote Originally Posted by ReefCube View Post
    i run t-5 on my tank but i would have to say it is cheaper to run halides unless you want a cheap t5 fixture that only does soft corals. The good t5 lights cost a lot of money $600 + where you can get a really nice halide fixture for about $300. halide bulbs usually last longer than t5 atleast thats what I hear I replace mine about every 6 months at $20 a bulb it adds up. Also shimmer is a look that many people like and that is only done with halides. T5s are cooler so many people dont need to buy chillers where people with halides usually do in most cases.. Halides are not bad best bang for the buck it at all just depends on what you like and how much you want to spend.
    Alot of the fixtures are *all* now around 400ish, give or take. And the same can be said for MH, a good fixture also costs $$$ (look at the IceCap R/I fixture that hybrids in 250W MH's and T5's).

    Quote Originally Posted by kkiel02 View Post
    I think the biggest push is the depth that mh can penetrate. At 24" you could go either way. I did mh because I could set it up pretty cheap with pendants.
    I'm looking through some of the tank specs for TOTM, and TOTQ (from RC, and ZeoVIT) and, alot of them are taller than that.

    Quote Originally Posted by hobogato View Post
    one of the nicest tanks i have ever seen was bernie's 240 gallon with only t5 lights. he had basketball sized sps colonies!!
    Pics?

    Quote Originally Posted by stangchris View Post
    I've talked to some people who have done both and I've done both, from my experience and from people I've talked with t5 is great but power seems to fall after a couple months so you need to buy fresh bulbs, also for less than half the price I was able to buy one MH pendent and ballast and bulb and I like the shimmer and my tank is 24" tall.
    Yes, but when you get to a real tank, and you need real lighting :P is it really cheaper to run MH. 2 250's, is a lot of power, and as someone else worked out it's around $40 per year per 100W more. So to run a 716W fixture vs a 350W fixture would be double the cost in electricity over the year, and of course keeping in mind that it *could* raise your temp, which may cost you more in the long run. If you end up with even having to run a chiller for 3 months, it would be significantly cheaper to have T5 from the maths I'm doing now.

    The other thing to bare in mind is that the fixtures are significantly cheaper than good MH fixtures. So if over 3 years you spend 1000 on the fixture and 280 per year on electricity, you'd be looking at around 2k. If you run the T5's, you'd look at around 500 for the fixture, and then 140/year on electricity, saving you over 1k over 3 years. At some point, LED is definitely the way to go, but is it worth it now?

    Quote Originally Posted by ballardjr2000 View Post
    I run T-5's on my 90g 8 54w bulbs 4 12k 4 blue actinic I am switch over to a different MH fixture for better depth penatration. And the shimmer is awesome to see.
    If you're going to sell it, let me know which fixture and how much you'd like for it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Europhyllia View Post
    I will stick with all T5s until I am able to afford LEDs
    No point in spending money to heat up my tank with my lights
    Exactly, that's the other thing to bare in mind. What do we do when LED, or Plasma actually becomes affordable in a year or two??

    Quote Originally Posted by ErikH View Post
    T5s need the right reflectors and bulb combos. Also those are zeovit tanks. Zeovit works to deplete nutrients and make the water superbly clear. The clear water often burns corals, in fact they tell you to be careful of that.
    Yup, but they're also SPS tanks with specific lighting that is T5, which i was using as an example ;)

    Quote Originally Posted by alton View Post
    For every 100 watts at 10 hours a day for 365 days a year at $.10 a KWH it is $36.50 a year
    Thanks!!

    Quote Originally Posted by alton View Post
    http://www.reefgeek.com/lighting/T5_...!_Bulbs_by_ATI

    I would love to try this fixture on my 300, any one want to float me a long term loan? And I am still looking at 808 watts, but it would be nice!
    HAHAHA, 808W though, is still pretty hardcore, and I've no doubt that the comparative MH would be much much much higher Wattage.

    Thanks for all the replies guys!!

  5. #25
    Join Date
    03-13-2009
    Location
    doesnt matter
    Posts
    7,459

    Default

    ok patrick why dont you be the first and get this plasma arc/t5 fixture

    http://reefbuilders.com/2010/05/15/s...tiful-fixture/
    REEF MAFIA
    "TEFLON DON"

  6. #26
    Join Date
    08-28-2007
    Location
    7500 Eckhert ste 310 San Antonio TX
    Posts
    733

    Default

    I'll tell you one thing, my power bill is $100 less last month than the month before when we were running 6 250 watt halides. $100 x 12 months will buy any t5 or led system on the market.
    7500 Eckhert ste 310 San Antonio Tx, 78240 (210)-391-1086
    Open Tuesday and Thursday thru Saturday 12-8 & Sunday 12-7
    zephyraquatics@gmail.com
    https://www.facebook.com/zephyraquatics

  7. #27
    Join Date
    03-22-2004
    Location
    Med Center
    Posts
    4,728

    Default

    I have run T5 and halides and nothing beats halides on growth....hands down

  8. #28
    Join Date
    08-20-2008
    Location
    NW San Antonio Braun/1604
    Posts
    413

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hobogato View Post
    one of the nicest tanks i have ever seen was bernie's 240 gallon with only t5 lights. he had basketball sized sps colonies!!
    Here is Bernie's 240 lit by only T5's......http://www.maast.org/showthread.php?...-of-Tank-Shots

    He was growing SPS all over that tank.
    Thanks
    Mark-

  9. #29

    Default

    Pretty, and yeah, seems that T5 would suffice... we'll see though.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    10-27-2002
    Location
    Corpus Christi
    Posts
    1,133

    Default

    I think it is a fallacy to say that 250 W MH produce more heat than 250 W T5. When one put 250 W/Hr for 10 hrs into a system, all of these energy will end up as heat, the same amount for MH as it is for T5. How efficient in lumen/ unit of energy of fluorescent (t5 is just a small tube florescent) vs. MH is debatable, but there is no arguing the fact that 250 W-hr input into a thermally isolated system will increase the temperature of that system by a specific amount whether you use a heater, or any type of light bulb because all of the light will end up as heat anyway in the end.

    T5 vs MH bot can produce a lot of light but like any fluorescent lights, T5 bulbs need to be change every 6-8 months or so or else the light out put drastically decreases. MH need to be change every 18 months or so, the degradation is a lot less even at 18 months. The price of 250 W worth of T5 bulbs is high while the cost of one of the Chinese produced 250 W MH is less than 20 dollars with shipping, cheaper if I buy multiple bulbs. I can get 10 years of bulbs for the MH for a single change of T5 bulbs.

    MH is a point source light, because of this reason, there is various level of light in the tank at various places. I like cube tank, very high light right under the bulb to keep my Magnifica anemone from moving and plenty of light for my SPS and clams even on the sand 20 to 24 inches from my 250 W MH (with a very good reflector). The point light source will also produce the shimmer effect that I love in a tank.

    DE MH fixture is very small and leave my tank top very open to keep temperature down and great ventilation. My tank need no chiller with MH but will need one if I use a T5 base fixture that cover the tank. (93 g cube with single 250W MH)
    My light is 10 inches above water level 250W DE MH with reflector, there is no salt creep or salt deposit on the glass of the light after about 8 months of use (lots of circulation in my tank with lots of water agitation). With T5 fixture, I always have to clean the light cover every few weeks or else the light output drastically decreased. After 8 months, My MH fixture is like new while a T5 fixture would be corroded, rusted and ....

    I use Magnetic ballast for my MH which is essentially indestructibly and will function 10 years form now. I avoid electronic ballast due to this the possibility of it mal-function. You would be hard press to find an electronic ballast MH, T5, VHO or NO that still function after 10 years.

    I like wide tank, 30 inches is my preferred width, so I use MH due to it being cheaper to start out with, produce the type of light that permit me to keep the tank better, look better more flexibility in keeping various animal in the tank. The light fixture (magnetic ballast) lasted much longer and bulb cost much cheaper to change. For me, MH is the number one and only choice. T5 is not even distance 2nd.
    Last edited by OrionN; Sat, 7th Aug 2010 at 10:34 AM.
    Minh

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •