Ok I am not an expert but I am starting to see a trend. People are going out and buying old metal halide ballast and installing new lamps and thinking they are getting great light because they now have MH. When they could of received the same results with compact fluorescents. Example when I measured the foot candles of Gary’s 125g which is equipped with XM 10k lamps and 250 watt ballast I read 2,250 ft. candles at the water and 75 at the bottom of the tank. I have been to several other tanks and with the same wattage lamps and read 900 to 1100 ft. candles and at a depth of 22” of water, and at the bottom of the tank the reading was 6 ft. candles. I took a new 15 k lamp that was installed in an old ballast, and it read around 1,000 ft. candles. I then took the same lamp and installed it on a fixture that had a fairly new ballast and it read 2,200 ft. candles. To compare; a new power quad compact 50/50 fluorescent 96 watt has 1,700 ft. candles, 96 watt 10k CF has 1,500, and 65w 10k CF has around 1,300. As you can see by this simple test MH with new lamps and ballast is far superior to compact fluorescent but it changes if the ballast is old and worn out. And remember that a worn out ballast uses more energy then a new one. Retail stores are starting to learn that they can replace old lamps and ballast with new, and in a short few years they will pay for themselves in energy savings. And by the way I received my latest electric bill from CPS. The consumption was up slightly but the surcharges doubled and where around a $100!



Reply With Quote
