I remembered something about this but don't remember details. Were people having problems with the XMs running on electronic ballasts.
I was thinking about selling my 400 watt setup and going with 250s but wanted to find out before buying bulbs.
I remembered something about this but don't remember details. Were people having problems with the XMs running on electronic ballasts.
I was thinking about selling my 400 watt setup and going with 250s but wanted to find out before buying bulbs.
I had no problems with the 250w and electronic ballast.
::Pete::
The problem was running XDE's on electronic ballasts, at least IceCap ballasts. I think they are sadi to run best on an M59 ballast.
-Greg
Greg Houston
360 Reef Farm
Thanks for the replies.
i have three 400 watt XM and they are running all on M59 ballasts
350 gal. 7\'x36\'\'x25\'\'tall, , 3-400w.mh-10k, 2-6\' vho actinic, 175gal.sump, 6ft. 100gal zenia fuge,calcium reactor, kalk reactor and a carbon reactor. 7\' turbofloter 5000 skimmer.
If you havent seen this it's well worth a read... The reason I'm posting this is because after reading the thread I decided to go with the XM's and the ARO ballast. I never heard/read anything but good stuff about both.
This is a comparison of a ton of different 250w bulbs along with different ballasts. You will find plenty of data for each bulb as well as discussion about all the bulbs & ballasts.
I am running 400w 20k xm's and coralvue 14K's on newer icecap ballasts. Used to run ushio 10K's also. No problems with any of them on the icecap electronic ballast.