Feed Me!

[Europhyllia]

I was looking to find an article that closely reflected my views on feeding and found this one written by a marine biologist:
http://blog.captive-aquatics.com/captive_aquatics/2009/10/feeding-your-reef-aquarium.html

(isn't the internet great? You're sure to find something in writing to back up your views no matter what they might be!)

I thought I'll throw out interesting topics from time to time to discuss. So here's my first one. :)

To put my own thoughts on the article in mom talk: You don't want your baby to get diaper rash but that doesn't mean you don't stop feeding it -you just make sure you frequently change the diaper. ;)

Let's talk about the article.

[Europhyllia]

Oh and the one thing I don't agree with in the article is that phyto is useless. I definitely see a different in pod population when I dose phyto so in and indirect way phyto does feed the zooplankton eaters.

[phippsj]

I am not sure about everybody else, but I think of a reef as an ecosystem. This system will balance itself if it is the presence of consistency. In my mind that means stable, consistent lighting. Stable, consistent water changes. Stable, consistent feedings and no drastic changes to livestock. I often hear people say that each reef tank is different, and you have to get to know your own. I think that people are creatures of habit, and that we maintain those same habits with our reef tanks.

Now don't go thinking that this is an unconstrained thought. Obviously there are parameters to be considered. What I am trying to convey is that, within a range, the reef tank / system develops its own ecosystem and that us reef keepers are a part of that system. Our habits are important parts of the environment that sustains the reef tank, including larger feedings.

I would also add that it is genearlly assumed that making small bio load changes is a good thing in this hobby. The mantras are "don't stock your tank to quick", etc. That allows for the system to develop.

[ErikH]

I only feed phyto, cyclops, PE mysis, and Bloodworms. I soak them in Omega3s first.

[Kristy]

There was a lot that I liked about this article, especially the explanation that having a low level of dissolved nutrients is not equal to failing to feed adequately.

We have always fed heavily, both the fish and the corals, and see tremendous differences in our growth rate of corals when we are feeding them. As a result of this, there have been times when we've struggled with both nitrates and phosphates, but have overall been very successful with a faithful water change routine and a good combination of natural clean-up crew (along with the usual: refugium of macro, deep sand bed fuge, and decent skimmer).

We are still figuring out how to consistently master keeping corals that thrive (but then again, who isn't, I suppose) but we have a pretty good handle on keeping fish that thrive. Fish that are well-fed seems to be the number one determinant for their resilience and overall health, from my perspective.

My most recent enjoyable feeding find: I read an article that recommended salmon roe eggs as the most perfect (nutritionally complete) balance of food for both fish and corals and went out in search of some. Found some eggs, not salmon, at an Asian food market that are meant for rolling into your sushi. Experimented with rinsing them and feeding them to our fish and got a VERY enthusiastic response. There is no greater pleasure than watching our (formerly very skinny but not any longer!) long-nosed butterfly fish eagerly poke his snout straight up out of the water to beg to be fed more of these eggs. Amazing to watch the polyps grab them up eagerly as well!

[justahobby]

Great article. He did sound a little bias on the use of phyto. I think the important thing to remember is don't skimp on feeding BUT you must keep up with nutrient exportation.

[Europhyllia]

My most recent enjoyable feeding find: I read an article that recommended salmon roe eggs as the most perfect (nutritionally complete) balance of food for both fish and corals and went out in search of some. Found some eggs, not salmon, at an Asian food market that are meant for rolling into your sushi. Experimented with rinsing them and feeding them to our fish and got a VERY enthusiastic response. There is no greater pleasure than watching our (formerly very skinny but not any longer!) long-nosed butterfly fish eagerly poke his snout straight up out of the water to beg to be fed more of these eggs. Amazing to watch the polyps grab them up eagerly as well!

I've tried the flying fish eggs from the Asian Food market but it drove my skimmer bonkers. I now use Prawn Eggs instead. I wish somebody would carry them locally but I usually have to get them online. They're packaged by Nutramar and called Ova - specifically for fish and corals. Maybe something else to try :)

[kkiel02]

Well all I can say is I want those blastos.

I personally feed fairly heavy to make sure all my fish have a chance to eat. I know alot of people have their opinions and they also work but I believe in my skimmer and macro so I have been able to get away with my way thus far. One thing I have realized is that there are many ways of successfully keeping a reef. Each person has their way and if it works I say do it. If you think about it each reef has different detriovores, bacteria, etc. so what works for someone may not work for the next person.

[dpotts]

Hmmmm...just tried to open the article and my computer security freaked out saying that there was a trojan virus attached to it and wouldn't let me open it!!! What's up with that??!!:at_wits_end:

[Jordan N.]

Hmmmm...just tried to open the article and my computer security freaked out saying that there was a trojan virus attached to it and wouldn't let me open it!!! What's up with that??!!:at_wits_end:



I often hear the phrases “In the wild, reefs are nutrient poor” and “a reef aquarium should have a low nutrient level”. Seeming in contrast to these statements is the necessity of feeding the coral and other inhabitants of the reef aquarium. What do these phrases really mean, especially to the hobbyist?

These terms are somewhat confusing, and lead many reef aquarists to believe that they should feed their reef aquariums sparingly, and avoid a “high bio-load” of fish and other animals. This is a misinterpretation, and aquarists should be encouraged to feed heavily and should not be overly concerned about stocking fish in a reef aquarium to reasonable levels. As a marine biologist and hobbyist, I'd like to shed some light on what originated as a scientific statement that is now often (mis)used in the hobby.

“Nutrients” commonly refers to all Dissolved Organic Compounds (DOC's) measurable in a given sample and a given location, but for the purposes of this article will refer to dissolved organic compounds that can be easily measured and are familiar to aquarists, mainly ions such as nitrates (NO3-) and organic phosphates (PO4-). Both of these organic compounds are absolutely essential to life, and coral and other reef invertebrates are no exception. Minute readings of nitrates and phosphates are vastly preferably to zero in terms of coral health and growth!

The phrase “reefs are nutrient poor” refers specifically to the low amount of dissolved nutrients in the water column, and how available nutrients are usually confined to living animals. However, there is a very large difference between dissolved nutrients and available food source(s). Plankton, (phytoplankton and zooplankton), is incredibly abundant on a reef, and is a vital and constantly available food source to a myriad of corals and other animals. Corals live in a literal soup of food (plankton and suspended biomatter), yet also technically they are in a “nutrient poor” water (water with little dissolved nutrients). The fact that this statement causes confusion amongst aquarists should come as no surprise!

In the past, aquarists have an unfortunate tendency to associate foodstuffs with nutrient levels in the reef aquarium, a habit that leads to slower growth rates, and a lower level of success with some species. As there is no animal known that can create a full organic nutrient profile solely via photosynthesis, every coral requires some form of foodstuffs in order to survive and thrive. Luckily, this trend is beginning to change.


'LPS' coral like this Blastmussa merletii require frequent feedings to survive & prosper

Feeding a reef aquarium undeniably increases the dissolved nutrient level in the water column. However, this is most definitely not a reason to avoid feeding, or to feed sparingly, and in fact, can be a good thing. Today's modern reef aquarium, possessing a healthy anoxic sand bend and an efficient protein skimmer, is more than capable of preventing the accumulation of nutrients to harmful levels in between weekly water changes. I feed my reef aquariums heavily, every day, and from one who has fed both heavily and sparingly, I can tell you honestly that the growth and vigor of well-fed corals is astounding! I am not alone in my feeding method: any coral propagation facility that is raising coral for commercial sales feeds their corals an incredible amount when compared to the average hobbyist: often enough to completely cloud the system two or three times a day! Low nutrient levels are maintained in these facilities via massive protein skimmers, ozonizers, and very large (often daily) water changes.


Seachem makes several great 'wet-packed' foods

Although regular feeding has been commonplace commercially for many years, feeding has only recently begun to gain serious recognition in the hobby. Over the last two or so years, many excellent products have appeared on the market for reef aquarists who now understand the importance of daily feedings. Three excellent products that I've used for years and highly recommend are Cyclops-eeze (especially the frozen version), Coral Frenzy, Seachem’s NutriDiet, and Formula One. The first three are designed to mimic zooplankton in the aquarium, and elicit an obvious feeding response in corals. The last is marketed as a fish food, and is essentially a finely blended mix of several ingredients. Other excellent foods are frozen mysid shrimp, and shredded or blended raw seafood from your local grocery store.

Contrary to popular belief, phytoplankton supplements are generally of little use in the aquarium, with the possible exception of a soft coral or bivalve dominated display. The largest consumers of phytoplankton are living zooplankton, bivalves, fan worms, and other filter feeding invertebrates. Most coral species commonly kept by aquarists will not consume phytoplankton, and it is not necessary to feed phytoplankton to Tridacnids assuming there are measurable levels nitrates and phosphates in the aquarium. Unless you are interested in culturing plankton, keeping non-photosynthetic soft corals, or keeping oysters, phytoplankton supplements are virtually useless.

I list the commercial brands first because of their ease of use and convenience. However, more natural methods produce more natural, healthier, and more effective food sources if the aquarist has the time and inclination. Culturing of Artemia, Dapnia, and Gammarus is possible and fairly easy to do, if somewhat time consuming. Another excellent natural method for producing plankton for the home aquarium would be a refugium, preferably a refugium with a deep sand or mud bed, and stocked with plenty of macroalgae. The biodiversity revealed in a refugium that is stock with live sand, macroalgae, and a small amount of quality live rock is astounding. Refugiums have the added advantage of reducing your tanks’ dissolved nutrient level: nutrients are both filtered and stored biologically by the diverse invertebrate fauna that can be found in a refugium, or are removed directly by pruning and removing excess macroalgae growth. Bigger is definitely better in the case of refugiums: build or buy the largest one you can fit and/or afford because they are well worth the investment.

Feeding corals can be a challenge, but here are a few general guidelines to help you in your quest to provide better nutrition:

Soft corals such as ricordea mushrooms and zooanthids (button polyps) are greedy eaters of all small foodstuffs: while mysids are usually too large, Cyclops-eeze and Coral Frenzy are greedily consumed, as are Artemia nauplii. My Ricordea yuma population almost doubles in size every month on a diet of Coral Frenzy alone! A few soft corals will feed upon phytoplankton, such as Nepthea spp and other (usually non-photosynthetic) soft corals.

'LPS', or large polyp stony corals are voracious eaters, especially of meaty food items, such as mysids, mashed Formula One, Gammarus or Daphnia, and shredded raw shrimp and other seafood. LPS corals should be target fed at least three times a week to ensure adequate nutrition and to increase growth rate.

SPS, or small polyp stony corals often have an unknown food requirement. However, oyster eggs, finely blended meaty seafoods, and Artemia nauplii are often consumed.

Although brief, I hope that this article touching upon the importance of feeding the reef aquarium will benefit hobbyists, as well as dispel a few misunderstandings that tend to crop up again and again in this hobby. Please keep in mind virtually all reef inverts can slowly starve over a period of months/years. A "mystery death" after a few months to eighteen months can usually be attributed to slow attrition, of which the hobbyist was unaware. I have a saying; “if it’s not growing, it’s starving!”, so feed, feed, feed!

[Mr.Schertz]

interesting article.

[Europhyllia]

Thanks Jordan for posting the whole text for dpotts :)
I think the last paragraphs contained the most memorable things for me:

keep in mind virtually all reef inverts can slowly starve over a period of months/years.

It's tough to tell if something is really doing well since it takes them so long to visibly not do well.

if it’s not growing, it’s starving!

I guess that could be a better indicator rather than just seeing if it's still in the same shape, see if it grew.