View Full Version : ID this Zoa please
puretexn
Sun, 8th Feb 2009, 12:16 AM
I picked up this frag from Aquarium Masters a couple months ago, and it was fresh trade in, so no ID was listed. (I grabbed it the same day it came in).
http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/4136/img0881ku3.jpg
http://img24.imageshack.us/img24/7634/img0885hq3.jpg
Also, what's the name of this star? Is it reef safe?
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/7945/img0886rc9.jpg
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9408/img0887nr3.jpg
Thanks,
PT
BioCube14
Sun, 8th Feb 2009, 12:31 AM
nuclear greens morph from your lighting
Mr Cob
Sun, 8th Feb 2009, 02:11 AM
Sea Star: Bumps/Spikes are a sign that it is not reef safe.
Not sure what type it is, but I learned this when I added a chocolate chip to my reef when I was a noob...and I got schooled. Bumps= "Bad news for a reef". The star tore through my candy canes...an entire colony before I knew what was up.
Jonthefishguy
Sun, 8th Feb 2009, 09:07 AM
It is a Spiny Sea Star / Echinaster echinophorus
If feeds on microorganisms and detritus and is very difficult to feed. It is reef safe but not with sessile inverts and doesnt do well in aquariums due to starvation and poor acclimation. Extra care should be taken to see that it eats or it wont last long.
Aqua-Dome
Sun, 8th Feb 2009, 01:41 PM
Corals are sessile invertebrates. Compatibility with corals is the main determination of "reef safe". In practice, haitian red knobby sea stars are quite safe with corals and can be kept for many years in even small aquaria. They will eat sponges and unfortunately often succumb early to bacterial infection from mishandling along the distribution line.
Mr Cob
Sun, 8th Feb 2009, 05:39 PM
I personally would not add that Sea Star to a reef and I would not clasify it as reef safe. But that's just me I guess.
http://www.saltwaterfish.com/site_11_03/Knobby-Starfish_606_63_4_4.html
Rychek
Sun, 8th Feb 2009, 06:04 PM
I have no idea on the sea star, but the zoas look more like faded Green Bay Packers (http://www.zoaid.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=118) than Nuclear Greens (http://www.zoaid.com/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=2976) to me.
stoneroller
Sun, 8th Feb 2009, 08:01 PM
+1 on the packers
puretexn
Sun, 8th Feb 2009, 08:29 PM
Packers after being stomped by the cowboys sounds a little better than "faded Green Bay Packers"...lol
thanks guys, and I'll keep an eye on the star. So far it touched the clam, button polyps, star polyps, open brain, and the candy cane and turned away.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.