View Full Version : to Dual ballast or not to Dual ballast??
reybeast
Fri, 24th Oct 2008, 05:30 PM
I would like to add (2) 250w metal halides to my 90G along with (2)110w VHOs, and I have 2 choices, use a single (dual) ballast for both, or buy (2) seperate ballasts (one for each light). What is the preferred method? I have plenty of outlets, and plenty of room for either configuration. Is it less electricity for one unit or two? Is there an advantage to having two units vs one? It seems to be cheaper to buy the one (dual) unit.
bimmerzs
Fri, 24th Oct 2008, 05:50 PM
Only disadvantage's I see with using a dual ballast are:
1. If it needs servicing, you are totally in the dark
2. You will not be able to operate each light independantly if you use a controller/DC8 type setup.
3. Harder to mount due to size/weight
4. May have proprietary plugs so if you do need to borrow temp ballasts from someone, you may have to splice into the cables.
5. I really like Icecap ballast.....:)
Cheers,
Joshua
Fri, 24th Oct 2008, 10:28 PM
I like separate ballasts.
JeffCo
Fri, 24th Oct 2008, 11:15 PM
Yes, another vote for separate ballasts. Much easier to work with and they will stay cooler.
mikedelgado
Sat, 25th Oct 2008, 07:04 AM
seperate ballastsfor me.
I have only seen dual ballasts in the magnetic type. they are pretty big.
alton
Sat, 25th Oct 2008, 12:46 PM
One more vote for seperate ballast.
dustint21
Sat, 25th Oct 2008, 03:42 PM
I have seperate ARO ballast on my 90 gallon! Love them! They fire DE and SE bulbs!
reybeast
Sat, 25th Oct 2008, 10:55 PM
well, I guess the single ballast side wins...
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.