View Full Version : Skimmer or no skimmer?
Yano
Fri, 2nd Jan 2004, 09:20 PM
I have a bit of a debate w/ my self. I don't know whether or not to get one for my 10 gallon. I read around and some say skimmers in 10gallon is a waste other say its a good investment, please help me :D
matt
Fri, 2nd Jan 2004, 09:24 PM
Absolutely a skimmer is a good idea for a nano reef. I ran a prizm on my 10 gal for more than a year and I was happy with it. They're cheaply made, but cheap to buy so there you have it.
Inno
Fri, 2nd Jan 2004, 11:38 PM
I never used a skimmer on anything under 20g, hell even 35 and under lol. A simple AquaClear was enough for me.
Why not try without and see how you like it, then if you are not satisfied you can always add one later? :)
Tim Marvin
Sat, 3rd Jan 2004, 12:31 AM
Get a hang on fuge.
Henry
Sat, 3rd Jan 2004, 12:55 AM
When I had my 10gal nano I made a small hangon fuge with internal skim-box. Better than skimmer for such a small tank. That little fuge coupled with regular water changes made for a healthy and happy tank.
matt
Sat, 3rd Jan 2004, 01:37 AM
On my 10 I had a refugium and a skimmer; and an auto top off system. That was a cool little tank, in fact, I think I'll set it up again to breed berghia nudibranchs. The advice about the refugium is good; actually, something like a 40 gallon refugium would be perfect! I still think a skimmer is a good thing for such a little tank, though. Keeps O2 and ph steady, and it's real easy to overfeed a nano.
Henry
Sat, 3rd Jan 2004, 01:48 AM
I agree with Matt on the skimmer helping with the ph and especially the O2 part.
Yano
Sat, 3rd Jan 2004, 09:59 AM
Thanks for the advice guys, time to start saving money :D
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.